Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Serlin, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Marascuilo, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Planned and Post Hoc Comparisons in Tests of Concordance and Discordance forG Groups of Judges

Ronald C. Serlin

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Leonard A. Marascuilo

University of California, Berkeley

Statistical procedures for making comparisons on the ranking of a set ofK elements, wines, people, and so forth, have been worked out for the case in which the ranking is done by a single group ofn people. In this special situation, Friedman’s test can be called upon to assess the significance of differences in mean ranking, and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance can be used to measure the level of agreement among the individuals doing the ranking.

Unfortunately, the problem of comparingG groups of subjects to determine whether or not they produce the same mean ranking has, until recently, remained unanswered. A procedure was developed for testing two-group concordance by Schucany and Frawley. Hollander and Sethuraman have questioned this procedure and have provided an alternative model for investigating the same problem. It is easy to show that the Schucany and Frawley model tests for positive rank correlation in the mean ranks as an alternative, whereas the Hollander and Sethuraman model tests identity of mean ranks across theK compared elements as the null. In this article, these two models are examined, the criticism is evaluated, and both models are extended to theG group situation. The extension to planned and post hoc comparisons is illustrated using data based on a study described by Marascuilo and Dagenais.

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 187-205 (1983)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986008003187


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page