This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vijn, P. Articles by Molenaar, I. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Robustness Regions for Dichotomous Decisions

University of Amsterdam

Ivo W. Molenaar

University of Groningen

This expository paper intends to give educational researchers suitable access to a method for investigating the stability of their dichotomous decisions under changes of assumptions. Inferences and decisions based on statistical models typically involve model assumptions, such as normality and independence of observations. In statistical decision theory, one also has to specify loss functions, and in a Bayesian analysis a prior distribution has to be specified. In the case of dichotomous decisions (passing or failing a student, choosing between two teaching methods, rejecting or retaining a hypothesis), the total set of all such assumptions/specifications for which the decision would have been the same is the robustness region (section 2). Inspection of this (data-dependent) region is a form of sensitivity analysis which may lead to improved decision making. Section 1 discusses earlier forms of sensitivity or robustness analysis, both data-dependent and a priori. Examples of robustness regions deal with mastery decisions (sections 3 and 4), evaluation of a teaching experiment (section 5), and aptitude treatment interaction (section 6).

Key Words: Robustness region • dichotomous decisions • influence of assumptions • robust mastery decisions • robust hypothesis testing • robust Bayesian aptitude treatment interaction

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 6, No. 3, 205-235 (1981)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986006003205


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?