This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Beckett, J. Articles by Schucany, W. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Concordance among Categorized Groups of Judges

Bowling Green State University

William R. Schucany

Southern Methodist University

Analyzing the agreement between and within more than two groups of judges is presented in the form of an ANACONDA (Analysis of Concordance) Table. Also, the consensus ranking (for those groups which exhibit some agreement) of the k objects is determined using existing multiple comparison procedures based on Friedman rank sums.

Key Words: Agreement • Concordance • Multiple Comparisons

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 125-137 (1979)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986004002125


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?