This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hafdahl, A. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Combining Correlation Matrices: Simulation Analysis of Improved Fixed-Effects Methods

University of Missouri–Columbia

The originally proposed multivariate meta-analysis approach for correlation matrices—analyze Pearson correlations, with each study’s observed correlations replacing their population counterparts in its conditional-covariance matrix—performs poorly. Two refinements are considered: Analyze Fisher Z-transformed correlations, and substitute better estimates of correlations in the conditional covariances. Fixed-effects methods with and without each refinement were examined in a Monte Carlo study; number of studies and the distribution of within-study sample sizes were varied. Both refinements improved element-wise point and interval estimates, as well as Type I error control for homogeneity tests, especially with many small studies. Practical recommendations and suggestions for future methodological work are offered. An appendix describes how to transform Fisher-Z (co)variances to the Pearson-r metric.

Key Words: meta-analysis; correlation; generalized least squares; Monte Carlo study

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 180-205 (2007)
DOI: 10.3102/1076998606298041


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R. Hafdahl Combining Heterogeneous Correlation Matrices: Simulation Analysis of Fixed-Effects Methods Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, December 1, 2008; 33(4): 507 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]