This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hedges, L. V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Correcting a Significance Test for Clustering

Northwestern University

A common mistake in analysis of cluster randomized trials is to ignore the effect of clustering and analyze the data as if each treatment group were a simple random sample. This typically leads to an overstatement of the precision of results and anticonservative conclusions about precision and statistical significance of treatment effects. This article gives a simple correction to the t statistic that would be computed if clustering were (incorrectly) ignored. The correction is a multiplicative factor depending on the total sample size, the cluster size, and the intraclass correlation . The corrected t statistic has Student’s t distribution with reduced degrees of freedom. The corrected statistic reduces to the t statistic computed by ignoring clustering when = 0. It reduces to the t statistic computed using cluster means when = 1. If 0 < < 1, it lies between these two, and the degrees of freedom are in between those corresponding to these two extremes.

Key Words: cluster-randomized trials • significance tests • intraclass correlations • multilevel models

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 151-179 (2007)
DOI: 10.3102/1076998606298040


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Rotondi and A. Donner Sample Size Estimation in Cluster Randomized Educational Trials: An Empirical Bayes Approach Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, June 1, 2009; 34(2): 229 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Mol, A. G. Bus, and M. T. de Jong Interactive Book Reading in Early Education: A Tool to Stimulate Print Knowledge as Well as Oral Language Review of Educational Research, June 1, 2009; 79(2): 979 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]