This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gitelman, A. I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Estimating Causal Effects From Multilevel Group-Allocation Data

Oregon State University

In group-allocation studies for comparing behavioral, social, or educational interventions, subjects in the same group necessarily receive the same treatment, whereby a group and/or group-dynamic effect can confound the treatment effect. General counterfactual outcomes that depend on group characteristics, group membership, and treatment are developed to provide a structure for specifying causal effects of treatment in the multilevel setting. An average causal effect of treatment cannot be specified, however, without a simplifying assumption of group-membership invariance (i.e., no group-dynamic effect). Under group-membership invariance and ignorability assumptions, the average causal effect is then connected to estimable quantities of the hierarchical linear model (HLM). Furthermore, it is shown that the typical specification of the HLM involves conditional independence assumptions that actually preclude the group-dynamic effect.

Key Words: causal modeling • group allocation • group dynamic • multilevel models

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 30, No. 4, 397-412 (2005)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986030004397


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Hong and S. W. Raudenbush Causal Inference for Time-Varying Instructional Treatments Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, September 1, 2008; 33(3): 333 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]