Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Randomized Item Response Theory Models

Jean-Paul Fox

University of Twente

The randomized response (RR) technique is often used to obtain answers on sensitive questions. A new method is developed to measure latent variables using the RR technique because direct questioning leads to biased results. Within the RR technique is the probability of the true response modeled by an item response theory (IRT) model. The RR technique links the observed item response with the true item response. Attitudes can be measured without knowing the true individual answers. This approach makes also a hierarchical analysis possible, with explanatory variables, given observed RR data. All model parameters can be estimated simultaneously using Markov chain Monte Carlo. The randomized item response technique was applied in a study on cheating behavior of students at a Dutch University. In this study, it is of interest if students’ cheating behavior differs across studies and if there are indicators that can explain differences in cheating behaviors.

Key Words: analysis of variance • item response theory model • Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) • random effects • randomized response

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 189-212 (2005)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986030002189


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
J.-P. Fox and C. Wyrick
A Mixed Effects Randomized Item Response Model
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, December 1, 2008; 33(4): 389 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
J.-P. Fox and R. R. Meijer
Using Item Response Theory to Obtain Individual Information From Randomized Response Data: An Application Using Cheating Data
Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2008; 32(8): 595 - 610.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
S. Himmelfarb
The Multi-Item Randomized Response Technique
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2008; 36(4): 495 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page