Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Linden, W. J
Right arrow Articles by Veldkamp, B. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Constraining Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Shadow Tests

Wim J van der Linden
Bernard P Veldkamp

University of Twente

Item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing is implemented by imposing item-ineligibility constraints on the assembly process of the shadow tests. The method resembles Sympson and Hetter’s (1985) method of item-exposure control in that the decisions to impose the constraints are probabilistic. The method does not, however, require time-consuming simulation studies to set values for control parameters before the operational use of the test. Instead, it can set the probabilities of item ineligibility adaptively during the test using the actual item-exposure rates. An empirical study using an item pool from the Law School Admission Test showed that application of the method yielded perfect control of the item-exposure rates and had negligible impact on the bias and mean-squared error functions of the ability estimator.

Key Words: Keywords: computerized adaptive testing • item-exposure control • item-selection constraints • randomized control • shadow test approach

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 29, No. 3, 273-291 (2004)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986029003273


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. R. Barrada, B. P. Veldkamp, and J. Olea
Multiple Maximum Exposure Rates in Computerized Adaptive Testing
Applied Psychological Measurement, January 1, 2009; 33(1): 58 - 73.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. I. Belov, R. D. Armstrong, and A. Weissman
A Monte Carlo Approach for Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2008; 32(6): 431 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
W. J. van der Linden and B. P. Veldkamp
Conditional Item-Exposure Control in Adaptive Testing Using Item-Ineligibility Probabilities
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, December 1, 2007; 32(4): 398 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
W. J. van der Linden, A. Ariel, and B. P. Veldkamp
Assembling a Computerized Adaptive Testing Item Pool as a Set of Linear Tests
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2006; 31(1): 81 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page