This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Holman, R. Articles by Berger, M. P. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Optimal Calibration Designs for Tests of Polytomously Scored Items Described by Item Response Theory Models

Academic Medical Center, The Netherlands

Martijn P. F. Berger

Maastricht University

This article examines calibration designs, which maximize the determinant of Fisher’s information matrix on the item parameters (D-optimal), for sets of polytomously scored items. These items were analyzed using a number of item response theory (IRT) models, which are members of the "divide-by-total" family, including the nominal categories model, the rating scale model, the unidimensional polytomous Rasch model and the partial credit model. We extend the known results for dichotomous items, both singly and in tests to polytomous items. The structure of Fisher’s information matrix is examined in order to gain insights into the structure of D-optimal calibration designs for IRT models. A theorem giving an upper bound for the number of support points for such models is proved. A lower bound is also given.

Finally, we examine a set of items, which have been analyzed using a number of different models. The locally D-optimal calibration design for each analysis is calculated using an exact numerical and a sequential procedure. The results are discussed both in general and in relation to each other.

Key Words: Keywords: "divide-by-total models" • D-optimal designs • item response theory • polytomous items sequential designs

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 361-380 (2001)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986026004361


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?