Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Articles

Detecting Nonlinear Associations, Plus Comments on Testing Hypotheses About the Correlation Coefficient

Rand R. Wilcox

University of Southern California

Let (Yi,Xi ), i = 1, . . . , n, be a random sample from some p + 1 variate distribution where Xi is a vector of length p. In the social sciences, the most common strategy for detecting an association between Y and the marginal distributions is to test the hypothesis that the corresponding correlations are zero using a standard Student’s t test. There are two practical problems with this strategy. First, for reasons described in the article, there are situations where the correlation between two random variables is zero, but Student’s t test is not even asymptotically correct. In fact, the probability of rejecting can approach one as the sample size gets large, even though the hypothesis of a zero correlation is true. Of course, one can also apply standard methods based on a linear regression model and the least squares estimator, but the same practical problems arise. Second, Student’s t test can miss nonlinear associations. This latter problem is the main motivation for this article. Results of a former study suggest an approach that avoids both of the difficulties just described. Based on simulations, it is found that the Cramér-von Mises form of the test statistic is generally better than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov form. Situations arise where this method has less power than Student’s t test, but this is due in part to t test’s use of an incorrect estimate of the standard error.

Key Words: tests of independence • Pearson’s correlation • Kolmogorov-Smirnov • Cramér-von Mises • wild bootstrap

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 73-83 (2001)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986026001073


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page