Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raudenbush, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cheong, Y. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Synthesizing Results from the Trial State Assessment

Stephen W. Raudenbush

University of Michigan

Randall P. Fotiu

Michigan State University

Yuk Fai Cheong

Emory University

Using data collected under the Trial State Assessment (TSA) of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), this article describes and illustrates a two-stage statistical model for investigating state-to-state variation in mathematics achievement. At the first stage, within each state, a two-level hierarchical linear model is estimated via maximum likelihood. At the second stage, results are combined across states using Bayesian estimation implemented via the Gibbs sampler. The results reveal considerable state-to-state heterogeneity in mathematics proficiency, but most heterogeneity is explainable on the basis of covariates defined on students, teachers, and schools. The findings suggest that interest in state comparisons might productively focus on state differences in policy-relevant correlates of proficiency rather than on state differences in mean proficiency. The analytical approach can be applied in other cases where data are dense at the lower level of a hierarchy but thin at the higher level.

Key Words: Assessment • Gibbs sampling • Hierarchical linear models • NAEP

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 413-438 (1999)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986024004413


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
C. B. Swanson and D. L. Stevenson
Standards-Based Reform in Practice: Evidence on State Policy and Classroom Instruction from the NAEP State Assessments
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2002; 24(1): 1 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
Y. F. Cheong, R. P. Fotiu, and S. W. Raudenbush
Efficiency and Robustness of Alternative Estimators for Two- and Three-level Models: The Case of NAEP
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2001; 26(4): 411 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page