Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olejnik, S.
Right arrow Articles by Huberty, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Multiple Testing and Statistical Power With Modified Bonferroni Procedures

Stephen Olejnik

University of Georgia

Jianmin Li

TRW

Suchada Supattathum

King Mongleut Institute of Technology

Carl J. Huberty

University of Georgia

The difference in statistical power between the original Bonferroni and five modified Bonferroni procedures that control the overall Type I error rate is examined in the context of a correlation matrix where multiple null hypotheses, H0: {rho}ij = 0 for all i != j, are tested. Using 50 real correlation matrices reported in educational and psychological journals, a difference in the number of hypotheses rejected of less than 4% was observed among the procedures. When simulated data were used, very small differences were found among the six procedures in detecting at least one true relationship, but in detecting all true relationships the power of the modified Bonferroni procedures exceeded that of the original Bonferroni procedure by at least .18 and by as much as .55 when all null hypotheses were false. The power difference decreased as the number of true relationships decreased. Power differences obtained for the average power were of a much smaller magnitude but still favored the modified Bonferroni procedures. For the five modified Bonferroni procedures, power differences less than .05 were typically observed; the Holm procedure had the lowest power, and the Rom procedure had the highest.

Key Words: Bonferroni • familywise error rate • multiple testing

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 22, No. 4, 389-406 (1997)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986022004389


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
V. J. Boucher
Acoustic Correlates of Fatigue in Laryngeal Muscles: Findings for a Criterion-Based Prevention of Acquired Voice Pathologies
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1161 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page