Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veerkamp, W. J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, M. P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Some New Item Selection Criteria for Adaptive Testing

Wim J. J. Veerkamp

University of Twente

Martijn P. F. Berger

University of Maastricht

In this study some alternative item selection criteria for adaptive testing are proposed. These criteria take into account the uncertainty of the ability estimates. A general weighted information criterion of which the usual maximum information criterion and the proposed alternative criteria are special cases is suggested. A small simulation study was conducted to compare the different criteria. The results showed that the likelihood weighted information criterion is a good alternative to the maximum information criterion. Another good alternative is a maximum information criterion with the maximum likelihood estimator of ability replaced by the Bayesian expected a posteriori estimator.

Key Words: adaptive testing • efficiency • item selection • optimal test design

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 203-226 (1997)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986022002203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. W. Choi and R. J. Swartz
Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2009; 33(6): 419 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
V. L. Passos, M. P. F. Berger, and F. E. S. Tan
The D-Optimality Item Selection Criterion in the Early Stage of CAT: A Study With the Graded Response Model
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, March 1, 2008; 33(1): 88 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
V. Lima Passos, M. P. F. Berger, and F. E. Tan
Test Design Optimization in CAT Early Stage with the Nominal Response Model
Applied Psychological Measurement, May 1, 2007; 31(3): 213 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page