This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cleary, R. J. Articles by Casella, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Application of Gibbs Sampling to Estimation in Meta-Analysis: Accounting for Publication Bias

St. Michael’s College

George Casella

Cornell University

There is a widespread concern that published results in most disciplines are highly biased in favor of statistically significant outcomes. We propose a model to explicitly account for publication bias using a weight function that describes the probability of publication for a particular study in terms of a selection parameter. A Bayesian analysis of this model using flat priors on both the parameter of interest and the selection parameter is carried out using Gibbs sampling to calculate the posterior distributions of interest. The model is studied in detail for the case of a single observed result and then extended to provide a method for interpreting meta-analyses. We consider models in which the probability of publication for a study might depend on other characteristics of the study—in particular, the size of the study. Finally, we apply our model to a published meta-analysis which examined the effect of coaching on scores on the SAT.

Key Words: selection bias • random effects models • Bayesian estimation • Gibbs sampling

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 141-154 (1997)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986022002141


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Gerber and N. Malhotra Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research: Do Arbitrary Significance Levels Distort Published Results? Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 2008; 37(1): 3 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. D. Pigott Missing Predictors in Models of Effect Size Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2001; 24(3): 277 - 307. [Abstract] [PDF]