This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ferron, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Teacher’s Corner: Moving Between Hierarchical Modeling Notations

University of South Florida

Students studying hierarchical models are often confronted with multiple notational representations. The purpose of this note is to illustrate the relationship between HLM notation and mixed model notation. This is accomplished by explicitly mapping the parameters across notations for a concrete example involving the hierarchical modeling of change.

Key Words: hierarchical linear models • mixed linear models

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 119-123 (1997)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986022001119


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. C. Doran and J. R. Lockwood Fitting Value-Added Models in R Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2006; 31(2): 205 - 230. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Singer Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1998; 23(4): 323 - 355. [Abstract] [PDF]