This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bradlow, E. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Teacher’s Corner: Negative Information and The Three-Parameter Logistic Model

Educational Testing Service

The 3-parameter logistic model is commonly used to describe the relationship among an unobserved latent trait (ability), unobserved item properties, and an observed binary outcome. We show that for certain values of the item properties and latent ability, the observed information about ability contained in the binary response is negative. This result has implications for maximization procedures, such as Newton-Raphson; approximate sampling methods, such as the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm; and Bayesian adaptive testing. All of these typically utilize the observed information. This result is contrasted with the fact that observed negative information does not occur in the limiting case with no guessing (2-parameter logistic model). The probability of negative information is expressed by a simple formula. This research extends the work of Samejima (1973) and Yen, Burket, and Sykes (1991).

Key Words: computer adaptive tests • expected information • observed information • three-parameter logistic model

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 179-185 (1996)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986021002179


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. L. Rulison and E. Loken I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT? Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 2009; 33(2): 83 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]