This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Seltzer, M. H. Articles by Bryk, A. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Bayesian Analysis in Applications of Hierarchical Models: Issues and Methods

University of California, Los Angeles

Wing Hung Wong

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Anthony S. Bryk

University of Chicago

In applications of hierarchical models (HMs), a potential weakness of empirical Bayes estimation approaches is that they do not to take into account uncertainty in the estimation of the variance components (see, e.g., Dempster, 1987). One possible solution entails employing a fully Bayesian approach, which involves specifying a prior probability distribution for the variance components and then integrating over the variance components as well as other unknowns in the HM to obtain a marginal posterior distribution of interest (see, e.g., Draper, 1995; Rubin, 1981). Though the required integrations are often exceedingly complex, Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques (e.g., the Gibbs sampler) provide a viable means of obtaining marginal posteriors of interest in many complex settings. In this article, we fully generalize the Gibbs sampling algorithms presented in Seltzer (1993) to a broad range of settings in which vectors of random regression parameters in the HM (e.g., school means and slopes) are assumed multivariate normally or multivariate t distributed across groups. Through analyses of the data from an innovative mathematics curriculum, we examine when and why it becomes important to employ a fully Bayesian approach and discuss the need to study the sensitivity of results to alternative prior distributional assumptions for the variance components and for the random regression parameters.

Key Words: hierarchical models • fully Bayesian analysis • Gibbs sampling • multivariate t priors

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 131-167 (1996)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986021002131


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-P. Fox Randomized Item Response Theory Models Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2005; 30(2): 189 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Seltzer, J. Novak, K. Choi, and N. Lim Sensitivity Analysis for Hierarchical Models Employing t Level-1 Assumptions Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2002; 27(2): 181 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. S. Maier Modeling Incomplete Scaled Questionnaire Data with a Partial Credit Hierarchical Measurement Model Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2002; 27(3): 271 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Patz and B. W. Junker A Straightforward Approach to Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Item Response Models Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1999; 24(2): 146 - 178. [Abstract] [PDF]