Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schram, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

A Meta-Analysis of Gender Differences in Applied Statistics Achievement

Christine M. Schram

Michigan State University

This meta-analysis of gender differences examines statistics achievement in postsecondary-level psychology, education, and business courses. Thirteen articles examining 18 samples were obtained and coded for the analysis. The average effect size was –0.08 standard deviation units favoring females; however, the results were heterogeneous. Although no model accounted for all between-studies variation, gender differences could best be predicted from the percentage of undergraduate students in the sample, the department offering the course, and the use of course grade or points for the outcome measure. Undergraduate males showed an advantage over undergraduate females. Univariate tests showed that males also significantly outscored females when the outcome was a series of exams. Conversely, females significantly surpassed males when the outcome was total course performance. Lastly, females outscored males in courses offered by business departments.

Key Words: statistics education • meta-analysis • gender differences

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 55-70 (1996)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986021001055


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. E. Cashin and P. B. Elmore
The Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics Scale: A Construct Validity Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2005; 65(3): 509 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. J. Onwuegbuzie
Modeling Statistics Achievement among Graduate Students
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2003; 63(6): 1020 - 1038.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
B. J. Becker
A Look at the Literature (and Other Resources) on Teaching Statistics
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1996; 21(1): 71 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page