This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Harris, R. J. Articles by Quade, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Minimally Important Difference Significant Criterion for Sample Size

University of New Mexico

Dana Quade

University of North Carolina

For a wide range of tests of single-df hypotheses, the sample size needed to achieve 50% power is readily approximated by setting N such that a significance test conducted on data that fit one’s assumptions perfectly just barely achieves statistical significance at one’s chosen alpha level. If the effect size assumed in establishing one’s N is the minimally important effect size (i.e., that effect size such that population differences or correlations smaller than that are not of any practical or theoretical significance, whether statistically significant or not), then 50% power is optimal, because the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis should be greater than .5 when the population difference is of practical or theoretical significance but lower than .5 when it is not. Moreover, the actual power of the test in this case will be considerably higher than .5, exceeding .95 for a population difference two or more times as large as the minimally important difference (MID). This minimally important difference significant (MIDS) criterion extends naturally to specific comparisons following (or substituting for) overall tests such as the ANOVA F and chi-square for contingency tables, although the power of the overall test (i.e., the probability of finding some statistically significant specific comparison) is considerably greater than .5 when the MIDS criterion is applied to the overall test. However, the proper focus for power computations is one or more specific comparisons (rather than the omnibus test), and the MIDS criterion is well suited to setting sample size on this basis. Whereas N_mids(the sample size specified by the MIDS criterion) is much too small for the case in which we wish to prove the modified H₀ that there is no important population effect, it nonetheless provides a useful metric for specifying the necessary sample size. In particular, the sample size needed to have a 1 – probability that the (1 – )-level confidence interval around one’s population parameter includes no important departure from H₀ is four times N_mids when H₀ is true and approximately [4/(1 – b)²].N_MIDS when b (the ratio between the actual population difference and the minimally important difference) is between zero and unity. The MIDS criterion for sample size provides a useful alternative to the methods currently most commonly employed and taught.

Key Words: power • sample size

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 17, No. 1, 27-49 (1992)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986017001027


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?