Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becker, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Small-Sample Accuracy of Approximate Distributions of Functions of Observed Probabilities From t Tests

Betsy Jane Becker

Michigan State University

The observed probability p is the social scientist’s primary tool for evaluating the outcomes of statistical hypothesis tests. Functions of p s are used in tests of "combined significance," meta-analytic summaries based on sample probability values. This study examines the nonnull asymptotic distributions of several functions of one-tailed sample probability values (from t tests). Normal approximations were based on the asymptotic distributions of z(p), the standard normal deviate associated with the one-sided p value; of ln(p), the natural logarithm of the probability value; and of several modifications of ln(p). Two additional approximations, based on variance-stabilizing transformations of ln(p) and z(p), were derived. Approximate cumulative distribution functions (cdfs) were compared to the computed exact cdf of the p associated with the one-sample t test. Approximations to the distribution of z(p) appeared quite accurate even for very small samples, while other approximations were inaccurate unless sample sizes or effect sizes were very large. Approximations based on variance-stabilizing transformations were not much more accurate than those based on ln(p) and z(p). Generalizations of the results are discussed, and implications for use of the approximations conclude the article.

Key Words: p valuessignificance testingmeta-analysis

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 16, No. 4, 345-369 (1991)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986016004345


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page