Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Fitting a Serial Correlation Pattern to Repeated Observations

Lynne K. Edwards

University of Minnesota

When repeated observations are taken at equal time intervals, a simple form of a stationary time series structure may be fitted to the observations. Wallenstein and Fleiss (1979) have shown that the degrees-of-freedom correction factor for time effects has a higher lowerbound for data with a serial correlation pattern (or a simplex pattern) than for data without such a structure. The reanalysis of the example data found in Hearne, Clark, and Hatch (1983) indicated that the correction factor from a patterned matrix could be smaller than the counterpart without fitting a simplex pattern. First, an example from education was used to illustrate the computational steps in obtaining these two correction factors. Second, a simulation study was conducted to determine the conditions under which fitting a simplex pattern would be advantageous over not assuming such a pattern. Fitting a serial correlation pattern did not always produce more powerful tests of time effects than not assuming such a pattern. This was particularly true when correlations were high ({rho} > .50). Furthermore, it inflated Type I error rates when the simplex shypothesis was not warranted. Indiscriminately fitting a serial correlation pattern should be discouraged.

Key Words: repeated measures • longitudinal studies • serial correlation • Markov simplex

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 53-76 (1991)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986016001053


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




AER home page RER home page JEB home page EPA home page RRE home page