|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Modeling Heterogeneity in Relationships Between Initial Status and Rates of Change: Treating Latent Variable Regression Coefficients as Random Coefficients in a Three-Level Hierarchical Model
Kilchan Choi*
and
Michael Seltzer
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: choi{at}gseis.ucla.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
In studies of change in education and numerous other fields, interest often centers on how differences in the status of individuals at the start of a period of substantive interest relate to differences in subsequent change. In this article, the authors present a fully Bayesian approach to estimating three-level Hierarchical Models in which latent variable regression (LVR) coefficients capturing the relationship between initial status and rates of change within each of J schools (Bwj, j = 1, ..., J) are treated as varying across schools. Specifically, the authors treat within-group LVR coefficients as random coefficients in three-level models. Through analyses of data from the Longitudinal Study of American Youth, the authors show how modeling differences in Bwj as a function of school characteristics can broaden the kinds of questions they can address in school effects research. They also illustrate the possibility of conducting sensitivity analyses using t distributional assumptions at each level of such models (termed latent variable regression in a three-level hierarchical model [LVR-HM3s]), and present results from a small-scale simulation study that help provide some guidance concerning the specification of priors for variance components in LVR-HM3s. They outline extensions of LVR-HM3s to settings in which growth is nonlinear, and discuss the use of LVR-HM3s in other types of research including multisite evaluation studies in which time-series data are collected during a preintervention period, and cross-sectional studies in which within-cluster LVR slopes are treated as varying across clusters.
First published on October 21, 2009, doi:10.3102/1076998609337138
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 2010;35:54.
A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2010

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|