This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bryk, A. S. Articles by Weisberg, H. I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Value-Added Analysis: A Dynamic Approach to the Estimation of Treatment Effects

The Huron Institute

Herbert I. Weisberg

The Huron Institute

Randomized experiments are rarely feasible in large-scale educational and social evaluations. Most evaluations are observational studies in which the investigators have very limited control over the assignment of individuals to treatments. Since the effect of an intervention becomes confounded with those of other influences, clear causal inferences are very difficult to obtain.

A number of statistical "adjustment" strategies have been suggested in an attempt to remove the bias attributable to these confounding factors. These techniques are based on a static model in which the outcome is a relatively simple function of various inputs, one of which is the treatment. In educational studies, one of the principal "inputs" is generally a measure of the outcome variable prior to the program. Statistical adjustments are based primarily on the observed relationship between these pretest scores and the posttest scores measured after the intervention.

An alternative analysis approach is presented in this paper. It focuses explicitly on the fact that an educational treatment typically involves an intervention in a growth process. By modelling this process, it may be possible to estimate expected growth for various treatment groups under "control" conditions. Actual growth can be compared with projected growth to estimate thevalue-added by the program.

A very simple model is developed here as a first step toward implementing this approach. The model is applied to a set of data taken from the Head Start Planned Variation Study. The results are compared with a parallel analysis using the analysis of covariance. Discrepancies between the results of the two analyses are examined, and it is suggested that the value-added results are more accurate in this instance.

Key Words: Value-Added • Treatment Effect Estimation • Observational Studies • Quasi-Experiments • Individual Growth • Statistical Adjustments • Analysis of Covariance

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 127-155 (1976)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986001002127


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?