This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Maxwell, S. E. Articles by Jones, L. V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Female and Male Admission to Graduate School: An Illustrative Inquiry^*

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Female and male admission rates to four graduate programs at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill are compared for 1972–73 and 1973–74. To assess possible sex-related bias in admission, rates are adjusted for applicant qualifications by analysis of covariance and by balancing. Guidelines for choosing between these two techniques are developed. The use of adjustment techniques for these data is shown to be justified in terms of Meehl’s analysis of theex post facto design. Other adjustment procedures, direct and indirect standardization, are critically discussed.

The adjusted admission rates reflect, in one case, i.e., for one program and one admission year, a slight advantage for male applicants over females, while in three cases, female applicants were granted a slight advantage over males in admission. In the remaining four cases, there is no evidence that sex of applicant,per se, played a role in admission decisions. Wherever a sex-related advantage is detected, the favored sex is that with the fewer applicants to the program.

While the generalization of these results to other programs and other graduate schools is unwarranted, it is appropriate to emphasize the value of applying balancing and/or analysis of covariance to data that may be collected for the purpose of detecting possible discrimination in the selection or evaluation of identifiable population subgroups.

Key Words: Graduate Admission • Sex Bias • Adjustment Techniques • Analysis of Covariance • Balancing • Standardization

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1-37 (1976)
DOI: 10.3102/10769986001001001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?